Adviso Logo
01332 207336 sara.hackett@maple.uk.com
menu
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Mortgages
    • Pension Planning
    • Investments
    • Protection
    • Business Protection
    • General
    • At Retirement
    • General Insurance
    • Newsletters
  • Online Tools
    • Financial Calculators
    • Market Data
    • Research Links
    • Newsletters
  • About Us
    • Meet the Team
    • Client Feedback
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
    • The Openwork Partnership
  • Get In Touch
    • Contact Us
    • Mortgage Enquiry
    • Protection Enquiry
    • Pension Enquiry
    • Investment Enquiry
    • General Enquiry
  • Blog

Pension Planning

Secure your future with the right pension plan - let us guide you to retirement bliss

Pensions & Divorce

When using these social links you will be departing from our regulatory website. Maple Financial Solutions Ltd is not responsible for the content of any third party websites.

With pensions being most people’s second-largest asset, they can become a major consideration in any divorce settlement.

1. Offsetting

This simply means that the pension funds are valued, included within the overall assets of the divorcing parties and, instead of one party being awarded a portion of the other’s pension pot, they are instead given a greater share of a different asset (often the family home) and the pension is left alone.

In an ideal world, this system would be by far the simplest and arguably the best solution. Unfortunately, however, many people do not have sufficient non-pension assets to enable offsetting to be used.

2. Attachment Order (Earmarking Order in Scotland)

Attachment (earmarking in Scotland) can apply  to all private pensions (including those in payment), but not state benefits.

It involves the court issuing an attachment order to the pension scheme. This attachment order requires the scheme’s trustees to pay a proportion of the member’s benefits directly to the ex-spouse, when the benefits are taken.

The court can also earmark a proportion of the member’s ‘death in service’ lump sum, and widow(er)’s pension benefits, for the protection of their ex-spouse.

Earmarking has many problems, not least that the pension remains under the control of the member. If he or she decides not to retire, invest riskily, or take any other action prejudicial to the ex-spouse there is nothing that they can do about it. In addition:

  • If either party remarries, the earmarking lapses.
  • Earmarked benefits are all taxed at the highest rate of the pensioner, irrespective of the tax rate for the ex-spouse.

If there is the likelihood that either party will remarry prior to retirement age, then - except for some safeguard on the life cover side - this procedure is probably a costly waste of time.

3. Pension Sharing

Pension sharing applies to all pensions, apart from the state basic old age pension and the new state pension (except any protected payment).

All pension benefits are valued (see CETV below). The share can be granted by way of a transfer to from one scheme to another, or by one party becoming a ‘paid up’ member of the other's company pension scheme.

This latter option is rarely used, as the retaining scheme will not wish to have the increased costs, disclosure requirements and administrative inconvenience associated with additional members (non-employees).

The rules allow schemes to insist on ‘buying out’ the spouse’s benefits, if the scheme considers it appropriate. Most schemes insist on this route. The exception is usually the government and Local Authority schemes, which are ‘pay as you go’ (unfunded except for the local government scheme) and therefore reluctant to pay large transfer values.

Pensions that are already in payment (eg. through an annuity) can be ‘unbought’, split and ‘rebought’ using the annuity rates applicable at the date of divorce.

The biggest problem with pension sharing is the cost. Schemes are entitled to charge for the calculations and administration involved in splitting the benefits. The recipient must also consider the cost of any required financial advice, which may make the entire process uneconomical.

At present, little consideration has been given to “co-habitant” relationships, although it is the subject of significant lobbying.

4. Cash Equivalent Transfer Value (CETV)

A CETV represents the expected cost of providing the member's benefits within the scheme. In the case of money purchase benefits, this is generally straightforward – it is the accumulated contributions made by and on behalf of the member together with investment returns. In the case of defined benefits, the CETV is a value determined on actuarial principles, which requires assumptions to be made about the future course of events affecting the scheme and the member's benefits.

5. Summary

Pension sharing could be used in many divorce cases, where offsetting is not an option. The cost though will be a key issue. Any transfers will have to be sufficient to warrant the large costs involved in calculating and organising the new arrangements.

Although we can help advise clients on their pension planning, pensions and divorce is a complex subject. Please ensure you have sought legal advice.

A pension is a long term investment. The fund value may fluctuate and can go down. Your eventual income may depend on the size of the fund at retirement, future interest rates and tax legislation.

Related Articles

| How Personal Pensions work | Pensions & Divorce | The Value of Retirement Planning | What is a Personal Pension? |

This article (Pensions & Divorce) is intended to provide a general appreciation of the topic and it is not advice.

For more information please contact Maple Financial Solutions Ltd on 01332 207336 or email sara.hackett@maple.uk.com and we will be happy to assist you.

Article expiry: 06 Apr 2027

UK News

Faisal Islam: Why the government is relaxed about Chinese car imports
The UK government believes the rise of China's car industry could be good for UK consumers and industry.
British Steel 'needs nationalising by the summer'
Labour MP Nic Dakin says it is "the best outcome" for British Steel as ownership talks continue.
EU airline industry warns of fuel shortages if Strait of Hormuz stays closed
Airports Council International (ACI) Europe said its members had "increasing concerns" about the availability of jet fuel.
Tankers urged not to pay toll to Iran for use of strait
Tanker firms are being advised not to pay Iran any levies in return for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.
Great at gaming? US air traffic control wants you to apply
A new government ad campaign is trying to persuade gamers to apply for air safety roles.

Get In Touch

If you have any questions, please get in touch and once of our team will be happy to help.

Contact Us Now
Maple Financial Solutions Ltd is registered in England & Wales no. 08713858. Registered Office at Maple Financial Solutions Ltd
Carter House, Wyvern Business Park
Stanier Way
Derby
DE21 6BF, .
The information on this website is subject to the UK regulatory regime and is therefore targeted at consumers in the UK.
Copyright © 2026 Maple Financial Solutions Ltd